If the Hippocratic Oath can be taken as the highest ideal of the medical field—separate from the economic structures that have built up around it—then something like health care should be judged by its purist ideals, i.e., the Hippocratic Oath. In that sense health care is more than a mere product. Those who reduce it to a mere product in the health care debate take this oath of healing and comforting out of context. However, if those who do wish to reduce health care to a mere product that is bought and sold in an economic market, why don’t they do the same with religion? Institutional religions are, by necessity, run in similar ways to businesses and their product is that of salvation. This is not so dissimilar from the way medical care needs to be run in a business-like fashion. Yet, I have yet to hear that we should treat religious goods as products or that we treat the actual organizations of religion as businesses. Perhaps, we should separate the highest ideals of religion from its organizational necessity, the same way we do health care. If that is the case, then religious organizations could be taxed as businesses selling products—products that promise healing and salvation. This new tax on these religious organizations that deliver the product of salvation, could, perhaps, go to help fund health care or reduce taxes for the middle class. Any thoughts?
July 2, 2012
Taxing religion to fund health care
By Jaime Wright
About Jaime Wright
An individual so traumatized by his parents' late-in-life conversion from "life in the fast lane" to born again Christianity that he has been driven to study religion for the rest of his life. His main interest is in religion "outside the box" ... religiosity as it happens in small groups, subcultures, and organizations. View all posts by Jaime Wright
This entry was posted on Monday, July 2nd, 2012 at 4:38 pm and posted in Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
« Is Geoengineering Now Inevitable? Or, Is the Only Solution to a Technological Problem More Technology?
2 responses to “Taxing religion to fund health care”
- Interesting moral psych research - changing languages changes moral decision-making sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/… 3 years ago
- Pope Francis pursues sinner across the roof of the Vatican - The Onion humor theonion.com/articles/pope-… 3 years ago
- Noah's Ark was one thing... Given current existential threats, is it now time to build a "Space Ark"? spacenews.com/article/opinio… 3 years ago
- Kiloton equivalent asteroids hit the Earth all the time. B612 Foundation wants to do something about it - great video vimeo.com/92478179 3 years ago
- What Science Can and Cannot say about Ethics: academia.edu/6658629/What_S… #ethics 3 years ago
- "I Will Wait For You": The Meaning and Morality of Waiting
- Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell: A Philosophical and Ethical Book Review
- Is Power Evil? The Ethics of Power
- Martin Luther King, Ethics, and the Law
- Of Durkheim and Facebook: Social Forces and Social Media
- Book Review: The Moral Landscape by Sam Harris, Part 1
- Niebuhr's Anthropologies Through the Lens of Genesis
- Peter Singer Reconsiders His Ethics
Search the MoralMindfield
- Broiling Base Pairs: Is It Unnatural to have a CRISPR Genome?
- Reflections on the San Francisco Archdiocese Sprinkler Case
- Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence
- Concupiscence and Evolution
- Self-Assertion as a Virtue
- Review of Cosmos Episode 1: Giordano Bruno Steals the Show
- The Transhuman Visions Conference – My Synopsis
- Mitochondrial Replacement: The Issue isn’t Mitochondria
- What Marius represents
- Space Ethics: Is Exploration a Moral Imperative? Why to Go or Stay Home
- Guest Post at CatholicMoralTheology.com – Biotechnology Needs More Attention
- Media Says Pope Francis Calls for “More Mercy, Less Orthodoxy”
- The Composition of Our Lives
- Should Ethicists Be Held to a Higher Moral Standard?
- Climate Change Enhanced Wildfires: Will These Burned Forests Grow Back?